‘Jumping off the edge of the world’: why Becher’s Brook must go

Let me be clear about this: watching Red Rum win (and come second) in Grand Nationals on black and white telly was my 1970s childhood. Red Rum was, along with Muhammed Ali, my sporting hero. And, because memory works in mysterious ways, I remember watching one, or the other, or both win, in black and white vision in the back room of my great-grandmother Walker’s little council house in Leicester; although I must’ve seen both of them elsewhere too. For me, the sport, my childhood and the family, the love of it all, are inextricably linked; so I can’t hate the Grand National.

Equally, these days, I can’t watch it. The reason being, that the statistics speak for themselves. I know, the odds are that horses will fall, and that from those falls, some horses will die.

I also know now, having looked at the Wikipedia statistics here, that horses are most likely to die in a fall at Becher’s Brook – the awkwardly-shaped fence that horses jump as obstacle number #6 and #22 and that jockeys have described as ‘jumping off the edge of the world.’

Of the 68 horse fatalities in 165 runnings of the race (and I think that 165 includes 3 runnings at Gatwick during the First World War), 15 horses have died in incidents that involved Becher’s Brook. That’s more than double the fatalities of the second most deadly fence (obstacle #4 & #20, that has no name) which has 7 fatalities associated with it. Becher’s Brook is unusual, not in its height of 5 feet – there are 6 others of 5 feet and the tallest, The Chair, is 5’2″, but because its landing side is so much lower than the take off (estimated to be between 6 and 10 inches lower). It was named after Captain Becher parted company with his horse, Conrad, at the obstacle in the first officially run Grand National in 1839. It is a fence designed, not just for jumping, but to catch horses out.

And it does.

And it must stop.

I have read people saying that, yesterday, Synchronised got up from his fall at Becher’s and galloped on, therefore his fatal injury cannot be attributed to the fence, just subsequent ill-luck in riderless running. I would say, how can we know? And then there is According to Pete who also died after being brought down at the same obstacle on the second circuit.

There are other changes, I am sure, that could, and perhaps should be made to the race. But the continued acceptance of a notorious and tricky fence that claims more horses’ lives than any other in the race is a disgrace. The statistic for Becher’s Brook is one that we, those who follow racing under either code, should not continue to stand for.

Captain Becher and Conrad came a cropper in the naming of the fence in 1839. In the one hundred and seventy-three years that have elapsed let us stand for progress, but primarily the welfare of the horse. Let the sad losses of According to Pete and Synchronised be the very last victims of Becher’s Brook.

I, for one, have had enough. Have you?

Synchronised

According to Pete

Advertisements

Posted on April 15, 2012, in Horse racing, Jump racing, News, Nostalgia and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. Written in hasty emotion – needs a grammatical edit.

  2. Agreed; didn’t bet and couldn’t watch. Makes me feel sick.

  3. So true, horse racing of any kind is sick.

  4. Assuming that Synchronised didn’t suffer a small injury at Becher’s that was made worse by galloping on, Becher’s Brook wasn’t directly responsible for the death of either horse. The other one, According To Pete, was brought down by another runner, which could have happened anywhere on the track. And Becher’s hasn’t been described as “like jumping off the edge of the world” since it was changed forever in 1990. Go and look at the fence for real – the drop on the landing side is minimal, and horses don’t land on the drop anyway – they land further out, where the ground has levelled out. The third-last fence is very similar to Becher’s but nothing falls there, maybe because it isn’t taken on an angle. The stats for Becher’s look bad because it was a very hard fence in the past, with a huge drop, especially on the inside, but for the past 20 years it’s been much more straightforward and this year both fatalities could not seriously be attributed to it.

    • Welcome to the blog Jason, but I am going to disagree!

      I wouldn’t assume that Synchronised didn’t suffer a knock at Becher’s, but, if he didn’t, he still lost his rider who is an asset to a horse in the race situation – seeing strides into fences, trying to avoid trouble and so on.

      As for According to Pete, well, he was presumably brought down by a horse that had also fallen at the fence, so even if the horse that brought him down was ‘ok’ the fence itself has still caused a domino effect. Even if I agreed about this year’s fatalities not being attributed to it and removed them from the statistics, there would still be 2 horses that died at Becher’s since 1990 which is not the worse fence in that time period (that would be 4 & 20 which has 5 deaths), but Becher’s remains the equal second worst since 1990 with two deaths (along with 1 & 17 and 8 & 24, the Canal Turn). Incidentally, three deaths at Becher’s (one a year leading up to 1990) was clearly a motivating factor in the drop side being modified.

      This further examination of the statistics leads me to conclude that fence 4 & 20 should also be changed drastically, it does not lead me to conclude that Becher’s is not a hazard. Horse racing carries risk, jump racing carries more risk. The Grand National risk factor is much higher than the usual jump race because of the tricky fences, the field size and the distance travelled. It seems obvious that in reducing the risk further, which I believe racing will have to do, the fences with the highest fatality rates bear closer examination.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: